User:Kylefloyd10/Eelpout/Whalenmr Peer Review

General info
kylefloyd10
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Eelpout
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Eelpout

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think the Lead section is very concise and clear, however there are some grammar mistakes that could be fixed. Namely, capitalizing the names of the oceans this organism is found in. The tone of the article is very neutral and includes a lot of facts which is great! All the sources in the bibliography seemed to be reputable sources, and I appreciated that the information included in the article was clearly attributed to a source. Also, there are sources from a wide range of years which represents the breadth of the information available. I was a little confused by the timeline that is included in the page, so perhaps adding some more text which explains the image would be helpful.

Overall, I thought it looked really great and I really enjoyed learning about a new species!