User:Kylerstrickler/Risk communication/Hannahmcfadden Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kylerstrickler


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kylerstrickler/Risk_communication?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Risk communication

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I think the lead gives just enough information about what the article will be talking about, but not too much. It introduces the subsections nicely and there is a flow to everything included.

Content: The content added is relevant to the topic and appears to be up to date. There are some that go back to as far as 2005 so maybe that could be looked into to see if there is anything more current about that specific information. Everything appears to belong and nothing seems to be missing.

Tone and Balance: There appears to be no biases in the article and the content that was added is neutral to the topic. There is a nice balance of information given about the topic.

Sources and References: The reference section looks good and the links work. They are also up to date on the information. They also accurately reflect what the cited sources saying the available literature related to the topic.

Organization: I think the article page is well organized and the order it is in works and is easy to read and follow. Grammar looks correct as well.

Images and Media: There are no pictures on the actual page or the edit you made. Maybe add an image about what risk communication shows to give the reader a visual aid.

Overall Impressions: Overall I think this is a very well written article with good information added to the page. I think the addition to the challenges section is good. Maybe look into the methods section more to see if there is anything that can be added to make that section a little longer. The topic was interesting to read about and it was easy to stay engaged.