User:Kyra05z/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History and society
 * I chose to evaluate this article because I am interested in history and society.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Yes, the includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * Yes, the lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * No, the lead does not include information that is not present in the article.
 * The lead is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Yes, the article's content relevant to the topic.
 * Yes, the content up-to-date.
 * No, there is no content that is missing or content that does not belong.
 * No, the article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. Yes, it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Yes, the article is neutral.
 * No, there are not any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * Yes, there are some underrepresented topics within the article.
 * No, the article does not try to persuade the reader.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Yes, all the facts are backed up.
 * Yes, the sources reflect on the literature.
 * Yes, the sources are current.
 * Yes, the sources are written by different authors. Yes they include historically marginalized individuals.
 * Yes, the links work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Yes, the article is well written.
 * No, I do not see any grammatical or spelling errors in the article.
 * Yes, the article is well organized. It is separated into different sections for different topics.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * No, the article does not include any photos.
 * There are no photos included in this article, so there are no captions.
 * There are no images to go along with the Wikipedia guidelines.
 * There are no images too look appealing.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * I don't see any conversations going on for this article.
 * The article is rated very well. The article is part of a Wiki project.
 * Wikipedia talks about these topics in different sections with different depths of information, while in class we talk about it as a whole.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * The articles overall status is very informational.
 * The articles strengths are that it is very detailed and has a variety of information.
 * It can be more visual and include photos.
 * I think the article is well developed, however, I think the article needs more information over certain topics.

Optional activity
What is the purpose of including many topics with no photos for visual representation?~


 * Link to feedback:User:Kyra05z/Evaluate an Article