User:Kyraa.lien/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Organic synthesis

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is somewhat related to my Science Paper topic. My initial impression of the article is that is it quite succinct, as half of the major sections include links to main articles on those topics.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article is very concise and gives a general overview of the topic. However, the lead section provides a link to a subtopic that is not included as a main section in the article. Additionally, the lead section only mentions two of the four main sections. The article’s content is relevant to the topic and has not been disproven. It was written in a neutral tone and does not sway readers towards one perspective. Two of the article’s main sections include a message requesting additional citations, which implies that the article is inadequately cited. Only a handful of sources cited in the article were published since 2010, suggesting that there could be updated information on the topic. The article is well-written and well organised with no clear grammatical errors. However, the article includes no images, so further understanding of the topic by visual examples is not possible in the article’s current state. The Talk page of the article indicates that this article is part of WikiProject Chemistry and has a C-Class rating. Despite this, there is only one post on the Talk page of this article, which was posted in 2008. The Talk post calls for a specific example synthesis, and has gone unanswered. I believe this article is underdeveloped and could be improved by the inclusion of visuals and examples of chemical synthesis.