User:Kyyrxrax08/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Historical figure
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. This article gives information on historical figure in literature area.

Guiding questions

 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?  The lead include an introductory sentence, but I think that is concise enough to describe the topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the lead include a brief descrption.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The lead did not include information that is not present in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? From my opinion, the Lead is concise, and more information is needed.

Guiding questions

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?  Yes, the content of this article is relavant to the topic.
 * Is the content up-to-date? No, the content need to revise.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? In this article, it did not address topic related to historically underrepresented population.

Guiding questions

 * Is the article neutral? Yes, this article is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No,  the claims is the article does not biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, the viewpoint are relatively neatral.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, this article did not attempt to persuade the reader.

Guiding questions

 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, the information were back up by reliable secondary source, mainly published books.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No, the source were not thorough enough, the information was not enough.
 * Are the sources current? No, the sources were not current.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes, sources were written by various author, and it did noy have historically marginalized individual.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, links were all funcationing.

Guiding question

 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the article was well written.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, I did not find any grammatical and spelling error.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, this article is well organized.

Guiding questions

 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, this article include image related to the religious helps enhance the understanding of the topic.
 * Are images well-captioned? Images were not well-captioned.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, all image adhere to wikipedia's copyright regulation. image's copyright infomation can be seen under the picture.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, the images laid out in a visually appealing way, and did not distrub when reading the information.

Guiding questions

 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? I can see the authors discussed about where to find a reliable sources of the terms related to the historical figure.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is not part of other wikiprojects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? In Wikipedia, students go find reliable source themselves and study through writing the article while in class teacher help us to find the source and we learned from teacher.

Guiding questions

 * What is the article's overall status? I think this article is not finished, many information needed to be update.
 * What are the article's strengths? The strengths of this article is that readers can have a overview of famous and valuable figures in literature.
 * How can the article be improved? This article can be improved by adding figures that is famous on Eastern world.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? I think this article is well-developed.
 * Overall evaluation

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: