User:Kzabs/International adoption/Cedobbs Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Kzabs
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kzabs/sandbox

Lead: NA
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? NA
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? NA
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? NA
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? NA
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? NA

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
Content added is up-to-date and relevant to the topic, no content appear to not belong. Room for more content.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
Content is neutral and does not appear to be biases towards one position or another. Content does not attempt to persuade the reader one way or another. If you needed more material you could possibly try to create a section about international adoption in some other African countries.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
All content is backed up by a citation and the sources cited are both thorough and current. Source number 4 however does not appear to have a link or anyway for the reader to access the information you are citing. The second source seems somewhat bias but you just take the facts from it and present that information in the article so I do not think it is a problem.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
Organizing the information based on country seems to work well. New content is easy to read and does not contain any glaring spelling or grammatical errors.

Images and Media: NA
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
You have some good information already and you have picked a good topic that will be easy to expand on my looking at the laws and procedures for different countries on the continent regarding international adoption, or even to just continue developing a section about international adoption in Ethiopia. I think one of the strength of this topic is how interesting it is. I like that you found something that is relevant to our class by looking at how something more broad and far reaching, international adoption, relates to countries in Africa instead of just starting with an African country and looking for places to add information. Keep up the good work. ~Cedobbs