User:LAP2000/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Voter database

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It was part of the political communication category, and it seemed like an interesting topic that may need editing.

Evaluate the article
The lead section was well done. It was concise and immediately gave a solid definition. The content was all well-written and descriptive, without being biased or overly written. One shortfall was that the article only goes further in depth regarding voter databases in the US, UK, and Canada. The article could be improved to have information about voter databases in other democratic countries.

The article is well developed, but could have more information regarding other countries.

Regarding sources, many of the sources are fine, but a few come from non-reputable or biased sources. Some come from personal blogs, and others are from partisan websites that may be skewed. This bias is not noted in the article.