User:LAmadefairy/New Orleans Historic Voodoo Museum/Sirenreins Peer Review

Lead
The lead is really well written and is very insightful. My only critic would be to see your lead as a thesis statement or topic paragraph it should give the basics of the information you are going to be talking about other than that it is really well done.

Content
You only have 2 major parts and there is not a lot of information on those sections but the information is really good. I would just add like special events that happen within the activities section and make a list of nearby places in the nearby section. I would also add some history on voodoo and on the museum itself if you are able to find any that.

Tone and Balance
The tone of your article is neutral. I will say i like your word choice because I saw the word copious and was vocabulary matters.

Organization
Everything is blocked off and named appropriate so I would say you are very organized.

Images
You have no images from what I can see so I cannot comment but using images of the city of dead or of someone getting a reading would be really cool to see. Make sure when you do put images they have a caption that is interesting but explains the picture.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)