User:LHzoology/Amphioctopus aegina/BellaW1102 Peer Review

General info
LHzoology
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:LHzoology/Amphioctopus aegina
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):NA

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - The paragraph added to the article body section would make a strong lead as it outlines parts that could be added to the article and gives a great overview.

Content - There is not much content added, but going off of the information added to the article body section, more sections could be added with more details.

Tone and Balance - The information added is unbiased and the tone is neutral. The information added is cited to reliable sources.

Sources and References - The sources are peer reviewed and reliable as well us up to date.

Organization - The content added is well written, however there isn't much content added to the article. The content in the article body section should be moved to the lead section. That information should be further researched, extended on, and be added into subsections in the article body. I've found that looking at other wiki pages also helps with ideas on what information to look for and how to organize the page.

Images and Media - Since this is a new page, images would be beneficial to add.

Overall Impressions - What is written is a great start to the article, just adding more in depth details into sections will complete it.