User:LIUCGiorgia1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Economic history

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I decided to read this Wikipedia article because it is relevant with the subjects of my course.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section gives an overview of the article's topic which is the economic history and it is useful for those readers that just want a brief explanation of the most important topics covered in the article. If you read the whole lead section, you will already understand what will be discussed in the following sections.

The article is divided in different parts: early history of the discipline, scope snd focus today, history of capitalism, academic journals and societies, Nobel memorial prize-winning economic historians, notable works of economic history, notable economic historians. The tone used in the article is neutral and there's no point of view that tries to persuade the reader about a specific position rather than another.

There are many sources related to the topic of the article such as government sources and some links that I have tried work well. There are also some graphs from the sources to demonstrate this point.

This article is part of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, in the Talk page there are many interventions by different users on their changes performed on the article.