User:LLLr37JC/Jesus movement/Wildpanda1 Peer Review

Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed?

- I am unsure if there even is a lead.

is the content added up to date?

- I would say that it isn't up to date. I was taught that it should be published within 10 years. All the ones they have posted are older than 20 years.

is the content added neutral?

- It seems like it is neutral.

does the content accurately reflect what the added sources say?

- I would say the content that was added was accurately represented.

is the content added well written?

- I feel as though it could have been written better. There are a lot of run on sentences and could be fixed. I also think that there are some gaps within the information, but maybe that is just me

has the content added improved the overall quality?

- I feel as though it did improve the quality. They added good information that improved the overall understanding.

General info
(provide username) LLLr37JC, Rswendra
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:LLLr37JC/Jesus movement - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Jesus movement - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)