User:LLonergan802/Burton Snowboards/Forest gump egg Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Everything in the article is relevant to the topic of climate change as right from the start it says they were one of the first companies to acknowledge it. This allowed the entire article to have a good stance at highlighting what they have done and mentioning their goals was good information as well. Having the lead be so descriptive makes the person really understand at what they are going to be reading.

The article may seem a little biased to favor Burton and only highlights what they are doing now and how they are limiting pollution, but I would like to know what they were doing before they acknowledged it and if their business is better or worse off because of it. All the links work in the citations and all of them support the claims that are being made.

The content was very well structured being made into four sections and that made it easy to read and understand the different topics that Burton was doing. The showing of the summits and what they did in 2007 and their 2030 goals was nice to have the timeline to get a picture in the reader's head of how fast they are going.

Overall, it was a very good draft and shows the strides Burton has made since the beginning. However, I would add some other facts that don’t show Burton in such a high light just to see the other side of it and not come off as a little biased toward Burton.