User:LPerez18/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Sociobiology - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I'm interested in any topic that has to do with biology, this article is very detailed and provides good information on the topic. Easy to understand and read, clear explanation of the topic given in the intro.

Evaluate the article
The lead of this article is concise, while giving a brief description on what sociobiology is and how it connects to evolution, social behaviors, and selection. The article's content is somewhat relevant to the article and up to date as it was last edited on 09/27/22. Seems like it is missing important information, clear understanding in the first paragraph when describing what sociobiology is.This article contains views from different groups of people, critics arguing that certain traits originate from social environment while sociobiologists explain nature and nurture and their "complex relationship". Provides arguments from both sides, there are no biased claims or persuasion taking place in the article. All facts are backed up by reliable sources, this article contains over 20 different sources showing there was a lot of research done on this topic. However, a majority of the sources used were from the late 1900s and early 2000s, so this article doesn't seem too up to date as its latest source was one from 2019. This article could be clearer but is grammatically correct, contains no major grammatical mistakes. There are two pictures of important, historical people in sociobiology with good captions briefly telling the reader who each person is. Behind the scenes on the talk page, there are a few responses on paragraph not being clear and confusing when it comes to a few points. This article is rated as C-class and high importance. The article is underdeveloped, needs some work should be clearer on the topics introduced, needs to be more relevant as most of the information is provided from sources in the 1900s.