User:LaborHistoryFan/Armand Lanusse/Lackes.uw Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mathieulalie


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mathieulalie/Armand_Lanusse?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template (sandbox version)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Armand Lanusse

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article’s topic?
 * The lead section includes all relevant information that is mentioned in the article body, plus relevant information about the topic author.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Great development on the topic. I like how everything is already sectioned out. I think the inclusion of a section about his literary impact would enhance the page.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Good presentation of facts, even the more debated topics. I like the inclusion of the author’s own words, as you have.

Sources and References


 * Are the sources current?
 * All of the citations in the references list are current. Nice variety of primary and secondary sources.

Overall impressions


 * I think this is a very solid start. With the variety of sources that you currently have, the article is off to a good start. Bravo for choosing an s-class article.