User:Ladymobamba/White Collar Crime/Maddie2025 Peer Review

General info
Ladymobamba
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ladymobamba/White_Collar_Crime?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):White-collar crime

Evaluate the drafted changes
The misconceptions section is written well with reliable sources. the source is relatively up-to-date. Maybe see if you could find a more up-to-date version of that Harvard study from 1988.

LEAD


 * the lead has not been updated to reflect new content.

CONTENT


 * The content added is relevant to the topic. The content is somewhat up to date, maybe see if you can find a more up-to-date study.

TONE AND BALANCE


 * The content added seems to have a slight biased tone, whether intentional or not. the sentence "They might be better off than the general public but they are not highly educated" might suggest some sort of "judgement" in one way or another.

SOURCES AND REFERENCES


 * the content added is backed up by a reliable source and accurately reflects what is cited. the source is from within the last fifteen years, but could maybe find something with more current statistics. After researching the authors of the source cited, they do not seem to be very diverse, but since there is only one source listed, the editor should be fine for now.

ORGANIZATION


 * i think the section provided is clear and concise. Again, perhaps reword the sentence mentioned above to sound more neutral, but other than that the sections reads well. There are no apparent grammar or spelling errors.

OVERALL IMPRESSIONS


 * I think the section of misconceptions would be a great expansion of the article, since there is not much about it already. You have a strong start to the section. The only improvement I would suggest is finding more up-to-date sources and studies.