User:Ladyoflorien75/Arthropods in film/Gadsuy56 Peer Review

General info
Ladyoflorien75 and  McKaylaOdum
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ladyoflorien75/Arthropods in film - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Arthropods in film - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead is good and concise with Elements seen throughout the examples given in the body, but it goes on a little long talking about the human perspective of a bug's appearance.

Content is informative, up to date, and relevent to the topic, however bug's life could use some quality cleanup and have more straightforward wording, I.e changing "While this movie may have some unrealistic parts, it does have some that actually occur in the real world" to "The movie occasionally strays from real life ant portrayal but remains accurate to the real-world counterpart."

Organization is good unless you are to add anything (Would recommend Blue Beetle!)

Needs more pictures and captions portraying to the films mentioned

Overall, the quality of the changes feels good. However, the article focuses too much on the good side of bugs when you mention the opposite end of the spectrum in your lead. The bugs life could use some cleanup on how it conveys its content, and its references need looking over.