User:Laeh101/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Addictive personality

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the subject matter was very interesting to me. This article is important because it shines light on an underrepresented group of people. My preliminary impression of this article is that it was very good.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article is very well written and thought out and it has many key components that are listed above. The article has a a clear and concise introduction that provides the reader with a general overview of the subject being discussed. This article consists of quality content that is up to date and it is all relevant to the main subject. It also does a great job of not having an equity gap and bringing light to an underrepresented group. The tone and balance of the article was neutral and it remained unbiased throughout most of the article. At some points you could hear the writer's voice come through, due to their passion about the subject but it was minimal. There are many sources that this author used and all of the sources seemed to be reliable. The links that I checked all worked and lead me to reliable sources. The article is well organized and it is clear and easy to read. I did not catch any grammatical errors. The article does not contain any images. The talk page consists of many people requesting that the citations be more organized and formatted correctly.This article is a C-Class article and it is apart of Wikiprojects. It also has 3 Good Article nominations. The article can be improved by removing the biased portions of the article and making it strictly informative.