User:Laj1032/Brook trout/Ritup1212 Peer Review

General info
Laj1032/Brook trout
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Laj1032/Brook trout
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Brook trout

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

- How does the invasive brook affect the food web or ecosystem?

Lead - I would say that your lead lines off with what you're trying to say in the article. It's not overly detailed or under detailed, it's just right.

Content - It's very easy to read and doesn't look choppy. However, looking at the original and then the edited work I don't see a lot of changes that have been made. I understand that it's a long article, so maybe you're focusing on just a few paragraphs and maybe rewording the rest. I would still think maybe try adding at least a sentence to each paragraph. The information maybe outdated since looking at the sources they date back to the early 20's, so there might be a slight chance of certain information being outdated. I'm sure there are some new studies or articles published on this recently.

Tone & Balance - The tone is maintained very well and stays informative throughout. It's stays neutral and doesn't try to persuaded the reader one way or the other.

Sources & References - The references don't look reliable maybe try looking through UNH library or google scholar.

Organization - The content is well written. I didn't see any spelling mistakes in the work that you edited. The rest of the original is definitely like a little choppy. But it is your draft so makes sense that you haven't gotten to it.

Images & Media - On the original there are already a ton of images so I see why you didn't add any more images. I would say that the original has a lot of like same subject/topic images, so if you wanted you could change it up. Even if you didn't the images are pretty solid and they do relate to the topic being talked about and enhance it.