User:Lalevi/Seahawks Dancers/COM 482 1 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? User:Lalevi
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Lalevi/Seahawks Dancers

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes, it is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the information added about the Junior Seahawks Dancers was great as well as insight into the qualifications the dancers need to meet to make the team.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? It would be great to include some financial info about the Seahawks Dancers, possibly how much they make if you can find the information as well as what their training and in-season schedules might look like.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, the article touches on the inclusion of male dancers on the Seahawks Dancers team and breaks gender roles.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

One note on tone : "The 2020 Junior Seahawks Dancers program was canceled due to government mandates surrounding Coronavirus." This sentence was a little too close in phrasing to the source you cited. I would rephrase it to something like "The Junior Seahawks Dancers Program was cancelled in 2020 because Coronavirus restrictions."

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? This topic could be looked into further with some more research and sources.
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No, there were two additional sources recently added. I think a few more could be added about NFL Dance Teams in general as well as financial info as I mentioned. It would be interesting to compare the salaries of the dance teams across the NFL organization if you could find the info.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes. The content flowed well and was written in a logical order.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The article had some great info added. I really enjoyed learning more about the Junior Seahawks Dancers program. I didn't know about the qualifications the Seahawks Dancers had to meet and thought that info was a great addition to the piece. Great job!
 * How can the content added be improved? Elaborate further on the audition process, possibly the criteria that the Dancers have to fit in order to make the team. Look into the fitness programs possibly as well as how long careers within the Seahawks Dancers usually last. I mentioned adding financial info and I think that would be a great to include.

Overall evaluation
Great job!! Your sources are credible and your overall tone was simple to read and neutral.