User:Lanaklaib/User:Kday hill/Gabriela Ruiz/Lanaklaib Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kday hill


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kday hill/Gabriela Ruiz


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The intro sentence for the lead has a good overview of who Gabriela Ruiz is concisely and clearly. It has a brief description of the rest of the sections, though the section about Lectures is not included.

Content:

All of the content seems to be up to date and relevant, and covers a wide range of topics about the artist. There doesnt seem to be any gaps in timeline of any information that is missing

Tone:

The tone of this piece is a neutral one and doesnt seem to favor any one side. The claims are all objective and do not aim to persuade readers to lean any particular position.

Sources:

All of the sources listed in the Bibliography appear to be good and credible. However, there are no citations added into the content of the article, so these should be added at some point to properly cite the information in all the different sections.

Overall this article is off to a good start. The content that is included is informative and covers a wide range of topics about the artist. The only thing that needs to be flushed out more is the in-text citations and the reference list. Other than that, everything seems to be goods and thorough.