User:Lanerino/Aqueous solution/Rmcconne Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lanerino


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lanerino/Aqueous_solution?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Aqueous solution

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The added subheading make it easier to read and understand. The added explanation of Arrhenius will make it easier for those not familiar to understand the concepts. I like how you split up the material from the article into different categories because it made it easier to read and follow. The introductory sentence is concise and makes sense for what the rest of the article is about.

Citations are needed for all information (in-text citations). The tone is neutral and doesn't seem heavily biased.

Need more sources for the information on the page and need in-text citations.

The article is well written and organized well which makes it easier to follow. I'm not sure if the picture on the original article should be there? Maybe add a different picture that goes along with aqueous solutions?

Overall, I enjoyed reading this article. The writing is nicely done and makes sense. It was easy to follow and had valuable information. Great Job!