User:Langgggg/Akan art/Aosiernn Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * I am reviewing the article on Akan Art


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Akan art


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The intro to this topic was strong and provided enough information for me to know the extent of what they would be covering. It was a general overview that set up to learn more about the topic.

The part on goldweighst was well thought out. There was a lot of good information that rounded out the subject. It was very educational and detailed which I found helpful. It was concise and easy to read.

The images at the top of the article are clear and help give the reader a better understanding of the subject. They enhance the learning experience as you are able to envision these object as you read about them. The pictures shown are of the gold-weights, it might be good to include some pictures of the jewelry as well.

The article is backed up by several sources, those sources are up to date. It is neutral and there are no bias's I can detect.

The section on jewelry could use some for information. The section on gold weights was well rounded and detailed, something the section on jewelry was lacking. It would be nice to maybe add some more about the significance of different kinds of their jewelry to round it out a bit more.

Overall this article is in a good spot.