User:Lar/Liberal Semi/Archive 5

Protected during July 2009

 * 1)  - I don't really understand why this guy even has an article, but it survived an AFD, so what do I know? Unsurprisingly, it attracts lots of nasty stuff, here's one that was up for over an hour and one for  two hours.  Sheep NotGoats   (Talk) 12:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Done - No previous protection (the recreation protection doesn't count). 3 months. ++Lar: t/c 22:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1)  - back-to-back vandalism lasting 80 minutes and 3 hours respectivly. -- aktsu  (t / c) 14:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Done - Was already move protected infinite, left that in place and edit semi added for 3 months. ++Lar: t/c 22:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1)  - This was up for 11 minutes today, and these for 14 minutes and 11 minutes last fall (plus plenty of briefer vandalism in between)  Sheep NotGoats   (Talk) 19:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Done 3 months.-- VS talk 22:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1)  -- This was up for over eight hours! And a few days earlier, this was up for over two hours. Obviously, not enough people are watching this page. Zagalejo^^^ 17:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Done.-- VS talk 11:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Rejected during July 2009

 * 1) . This was allowed to stick for over 13 days until I removed it today. It was added by IP users and apparently the page isn't watchlisted by anyone who knows this stuff must be removed. Although the article isn't a BLP the part removed by me was one long gross BLP violation and made up roughly 40-50 % of the actual content on the article. I hope I made this request the right way this time. Vyvyan Basterd (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well meant report but given our premiss starts with this page is intended to capture a list of BLPs that are candidates for,... this request (not being a BLP itself) should probably go to WP:RFP. Others may disagree with me.-- VS talk 12:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I concur with VS. Although BLP violations are added to all kinds of pages, this userproject was created to cover BLPs specifically. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmaman (talk • contribs) 22:11, 12 July 2009
 * I as well. Rejected. Please try WP:RFPP ++Lar: t/c 19:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)