User:Larry Hockett/GA review template

Below is my review of this entry based on the Good Article criteria. I will read through the article one section at a time and will leave comments as I go. As I read, I may have some feedback that I think would fall outside of the GA criteria, so I'll use a separate section to note those things. (Those details won't be the basis of a GA pass or fail, and I might just fix them myself at the conclusion of the review.)

Feedback related to the GA criteria
[In progress...]

Feedback outside of the GA criteria
[In progress...]

Summary

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Here is a quick rundown of where the review stands with respect to each criterion.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: