User:Larry the Magic Cat/Abu Naddara/Traderjo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Student editor: Larry the Magic Cat


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Abu Naddara
 * Abu Naddara

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead-in is straight and to the point. Added content is supplemental and helpful for understanding the history of the Abu Naddara magazine. Additional information that would be useful to add to the article would be any potential useful imagery or old snapshots of the Abu Naddara's production (if such a thing exists) or an explanation as to why the author criticized the royal family. Additional information as to the reason for the magazine's end would also be helpful for developing the full arc of history for the article. But content is organized chronologically, which is the best course of action for this magazine, and has improved the quality of the article as a whole.