User:Larsonem7825/Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS/Campenhe6493 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Larsonem7825


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Larsonem7825/Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * The lead section you have is very clear and structured. Is appropriately updated once the chart and citations get put into the article. This article also has a very clear structure, as everything is titled and all information is in its appropriate section. Overall, sources are reliable and seem to cover all material that needs to be updated. Of what information hasn't been cited yet, continue to chose sources similar to the ones you have already picked out.
 * The lead only needed to add some updated information, but overall flows well with the information that is already there.
 * The content that is getting added to this article is up to date and reputable. Only suggestion is to make sure to complete citations for facts you haven't and solidify fact checks that you have mentioned.
 * One thing to note is the United States section is not edited at all. It might be relevant to see if you can find updated information for this section as it seems fairly outdated.
 * Content added is neutral. Something to note is if you can't find reputable sources for a fact, I would consider just taking that part out of the section.
 * Links to sources work. One thing to note is source "Estimates of global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980–2015: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015" has been updated, and you may want to check if this impacts your article or not.
 * Image was not added, group needs to add image correctly in order to have this in the article. A reminder to caption the image once placed in the article and cite accordingly.
 * Overall, just make sure you are updated the fact check sections, properly putting the image in to Wikipedia's standards, and making sure all sections are up to date. Otherwise, this was a very well done first draft.