User:Last1in/sandbox

=In Progress=
 * /Lyceum


 * /Angola Oil

=SELCRIT strawman for List of Cryptids= According to WP:SELCRIT (part of guidance on stand-alone lists), a list article needs to have a (also known as or ) which is unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources. This article lacks that. Complicating the question is a very strong, minority opinion that this article should not exist at all. Since that question is handled through WP:AfD, a process which this article has previously either passed or evaded, I suggest we set a ground-rule that we are doing this on the assumption that the article is worthwhile and can be improved. Even if you don't believe that it belongs in Wikipedia, the article does exist now, and your input can help us make it better until you can convince a consensus of editors that it should be deleted. There is shockingly little guidance on the specifics of a 'good' SELCRIT, and examples have little similarity to one another. I propose that we consider the SELCRIT from two perspectives: what items can and cannot be included in the list; and what must and must not be included in the list entry itself. I propose the following strawman for discussion, dissection and/or TNT. A strawman is, by definition, designed to be ripped to shreds and put back together, so I am under no illusion that this one will be satisfactory. With luck, we can reach a consensus on better wording, post it, then see if it helps use reduce vandalism on the page (or at least better explain to people why their cruft and fanfic does not belong here). "# An item on this list must unambiguously meet all elements of the definition in the lead paragraph. This includes 'believes to exist in the wild' and 'disputed or unsubstantiated by science.' Imaginary, fictional, and mythological creatures belong elsewhere.
 * 1) The creature's name must be linked to a mainspace article dedicated to that creature. Red link articles are not acceptable, nor are those currently in the Articles for Deletion process. If a creature is not notable enough to support its own article, it does not belong on this list.
 * 2) Each list item must have at least one inline citation referencing a reliable source that is either secondary or tertiary, and is independent of authors who are prominent proponents of that particular creature. The source must either specifically reference the creature as a cryptid or use wording the closely matches the definition of a cryptid."

Will this solve all the problems? Of course not. But it can serve a purpose -- several in fact. It brings the article into line with Wikipedia expectations for a list article; for good-faith editors, it provides guidance when seeking to add or remove entries; and, for vandals, it gives us a way to explicitly show why their edit is inappropriate. With luck, it will reduce 3RR and repeated vandalism. Please propose changes below.

Windrush Generation
On 22 June 1948, a large group of workers arrived at the Tilbury Docks, Essex, on the HMT  Empire Windrush, a passenger liner claimed as a prize of war from Nazi Germany. Media at the time reported that 492 migrants arrived that day, but the actual number may be as high as 1,027 (the total number of passengers listed on the manifest). 802 of those on board listed a Caribbean nation as their last country of residence, and many sources now use "around 800" for an estimate. Of those, records show that 693 intended to settle in the United Kingdom, adding to the confusion over specific numbers. Regardless, this was a small fraction of the total inbound migration from the Caribbean that make up the Windrush generation as Britain scrambled to fill critical-sector jobs in the post-war economy.