User:LatdavoneV/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Environmental studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the Environmental Studies article because I am an Environmental Studies major, and I wanted to know what kind of information about this discipline that Wikipedia has.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section gives overall information about this discipline, and what this discipline covers.

There is not much information in the content. The content only includes the history of the discipline, see also, and education section, which provides the names of the top university that offer this discipline.

The article is written from a neutral point of view. Given the length of the article, there are adequate sources and references.

The article does not have any images besides the image of the earth. The talk page is not very active, the first discussion was in 2006, and the latest discussion was in September 2020.

Overall, the article is underdeveloped. The lead section contains enough information for a brief explanation of the discipline. The content section does not have much information, more information about this discipline could be added.