User:Latimhc0/Edward Wilmot Blyden/Foxjd0 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

latimhc0


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Edward Wilmot Blyden


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
In this Wikipedia article, the background and works of Edward Wilmot Blyden are discussed. With this, one would expect to see clear, chronological information regarding this man's life and what led to his success. In Hannah's edition of the article, the clarity is very present. When reading a different version of the article, I can see the detailed editions Hannah has added, making certain information easier to understand with her added context. She added specific dates, and clarified certain time gap confusion that I was having. She also made the article seem less mechanical, which many Wikipedia articles are, keeping it neutral - but sometimes miscommunication the value or quality of a person's work or accomplishments. It was very informational and easy to read overall, and I think her edits made it so, as well as adding context to some events or facts, adding to significance to what is being said.