User:Latkanybrian/Anglerfish/Dude1107 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

NemethrBC, Lauraellis4 and Latkanybrian


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Latkanybrian/Anglerfish?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Anglerfish

Evaluate the drafted changes
The drafted changes look really good! It all consists of new information not found on the page previously and there seems to be no problems with the sources behind all of the information so far as well. I really liked how all of the information was organized and categorized according to what was being discussed. I was a bit confused with the placement of the Stomiidae in this sandbox. I was under the impression that this species of dragonfish had its own page. I would assume that the reason would be due to the fact that the lures would act as a bridge between the two organisms.

I liked how all of the information was written in a neutral and informative tone and provided a lot of important details about anglerfish and their body structure. Further, they updated certain sources that were too old and replaced a few to confirm a few details in the paper. However, one of the sources they do use is still from 1968 and I can't help but feel it is a bit old to reference. The fact that the reference for the nature and makeup of the bioluminescent lure is from 1968 is the only negative to me. I would imagine that this topic is a relatively studied topic, so I can't imagine that this paper from 1968 is the only one that talks about these details about anglerfish.

Once again, I really like the changes made to Stomiidae and dragonfish as well. The information is written very clearly and in neutral manner, updating and providing a lot of information that wasn't mentioned beforehand. However, I have concerns on its position on this page over the dedicated page it has for itself. I took a glance at the other sandbox and didn't see this level of detail going into the dragonfish, so I just wish this information was provided in the other article too.

I think that the revisions and edits made by this team make the article more complete and accurate.

Response
Thank you for your helpful feedback! -Rachel