User:Latkanybrian/Anglerfish/TrevorCameron Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

LatkanyBrian


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Latkanybrian/Anglerfish


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Anglerfish

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead Section: No changes to the lead section of the anglerfish page. The lead section is already fine.

Content: The proposed changes add much more detail into the anatomy section of the page. They propose to add a subsection to the anatomy section about structure and bioluminescence. I think this would be a wonderful addition to the page as it would provide additional information about these rare characteristics.

Tone and Balance: The proposed changes are very neutral. It is about a specific kind of fish so there is no room for bias at all. It doesn't spend too much time on one topic or skip over another, it is very thorough but in a concise manner. It does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way at all, it remains factual throughout.

Sources and References: The sources used are very relevant. They are recent sources and plenty of them are used throughout the proposed changes effectively.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is very easy to read and is full of factual and informative, yet concise information. There are no grammar mistakes. Like previously mentioned, the article breaks down the page into subsections of the anatomy of the anglerfish, and a new section about specific anglerfish bioluminescence.

Images and Media: No images are used in the proposed changes. I would recommend adding more.

Talk Page Discussion: On the actual anglerfish page itself, there are many discussions regarding adding more info to the page. These proposed changes would contribute towards this.

Overall Impressions: Overall I love the proposed changes. The changes contain highly relevant and interesting information about the anglerfish that is supported by factual and reliable sources.

Response
Thank you for the response. I appreciate the feed back. - Brian