User:Laughsassin/Evaluate an Article


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? This article is pretty relevant to the topic and stays to the point throughout. There isn't anything in the article that was distracting or off topic.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The article seems to be up to date at least from my perspective.
 * What else could be improved? There seems to be the basic ideas of the topic there with details about each part, it could go more in depth if needed.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is neutral without any bias or opinions.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? They are evenly represented
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links work and support the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? These are scholarly neutral sources and they appear to be reliable.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? I did not see any.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? I did not see a rating or I just don't know how to find one.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It is pretty straight forward and to the point on what it has to say on the subject.