User:Laughsassin/Getty Tondal


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Are some areas under- or over-developed?The article while relevant seem under-developed in many places even with all the information posted on the screen.
 * Is it written neutrally? The tone seems to be neutral just stating facts about the work itself.
 * Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable? I checked the links they seems to work and be reliable taking you to the page of the actual text and readings about the text.