User:Lauloe234/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Florence Church Bullard

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the topic within the field of nursing interests me and the article itself is short and not structured. Since there are no headers or easy ways to find what information is provided, I thought it was important to evaluate and update this article to be easier to read.

Lead section
This article does not include a concise or brief description of what is found in the article, but rather it jumps into her background and biography.

Content
The article is up to date and includes information from Bullard's life as a nurse with some background behind the French award she received. However, this information isn't super clear on how it connects to Bullard and needs a better link to her life. It does deal with an underrepresented topic of women in science, but specifically in nursing.

Tone and Balance
The article is neutral and does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of any position. It includes her awards and why she got them to provide more detail about her life when she received them, but they are not trying to persuade readers of anything.

Sources and References
The article includes information backed up by reliable secondary sources. Some of the sources are not on Bullard herself but on other information in the article, however, this might reflect that the information on Bullard is limited in other sources as well. The links to the sources work.

Organization and writing quality
Although the article is not broken down into sections, it is written in a linear structure to correlate with her life. There are not any grammatical or spelling errors that stand out and make the article hard to read.

Images and Media
There is only one image in the article next to the first paragraph. It gives an identity to Bullard who the article is about by captioning it with her name. The image does not state the copyright status of the image.

Talk page discussion
This article is included in the Women in Red, Medicine, Women's History, and Women WikiProjects. It was promoted to a Did You Know article on the talk page.

Overall impressions
The article is rated as a Start-class. The chronological structure of the article is important because it helps develop her biography and life occurrences. The article also includes reliable sources that are referenced throughout. It can be improved by adding a concise lead section and breaking down the article into different sections so it is easy to find exactly the information you are looking for. It also does not include an infobox to help locate different pieces.