User:Lauren1500/Zan Fiskum/Lydialzy Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Lauren1500's work.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User
 * Lauren1500/Zan_Fiskum?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Zan Fiskum
 * Zan Fiskum

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The Lead has not been updated to reflect the new content added by peer. The lead that on the article is same like the old article.

Yes, the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead talk about the article is about Zan Fiskum who is a singer.

No, the Lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections.

The the Lead is concise, because only have one sentence.

Content

Yes, the content added relevant to the topic.

Yes, the content added up-to-date.

There are no content that is missing or content that does not belong.

It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance

I think the content added neutral.

There are not have any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.

There are not have viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.

Sources and References

Yes, all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.

Yes, the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say.

The sources are thorough because they reflect the available literature on the topic. And the sources are current.

The links are working.

Organization

Yes, the content added well-written. The content does not have any grammatical or spelling errors. And the content added well-organized because it broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.

The article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements, because the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. The article have include NBC, Spotify, and 425 magazine three different source in the article. For each source, it provide the title name and talk about what is the sources about to show how exhaustive is the list of sources. And it accurately represent all available literature on the subject.

Overall impressions

The content is not added improved the overall quality of the article. The article are not more complete, because the lead is same like the old one. And there are only two parts of the content.

It do have strengths of the content added, because only have two parts of the content. Does not have enough detail.

The the article does not follow the patterns of other similar articles, because it do not have any necessary infoboxes, and any other features contained within similar articles. But it has section headings. The content can have more details on it. And add more information on lead. Also can add some images to show how Zan Fiskum look like. Can put some introduction about her song.