User:Lauren2024/Edward L. Deci/Daltoncamphall Peer Review

Lead


 * The Lead for this specific article is actually the strongest part of the entire article. It does a good job concisely describing Deci.
 * The biggest place for improvement in the lead is to include a brief description of the articles major sections. Given that more major sections are actually added to the article.
 * The lead is fine for now, but will require some fleshing out after the rest of the article does.

Content


 * The content that is currently present in the article, while sparse, is quite strong.
 * Missing content is the biggest weakness of this article.
 * Additional content recommendations would be Early life, Career, Theories and Impact

Tone and Balance


 * No critique to the current balance and tone.

Sources and References


 * If possible, links and ISBN #'s in the selected works sections would be a good addition

Organization


 * No critique on the organization of the new content until sandbox is published

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)