User:Lauren2024/Edward L. Deci/Jlc223 Peer Review

General info
Lauren2024
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Lauren2024/Edward L. Deci/Bibliography
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Edward L. Deci

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead - I think the Lead section in this article contains too much detailed information. I feel like this could be broken up to improve the readability of the article.

Content - The article looks like it only contains information about his professional contributions. It might be nice to add some information about his early/personal life.

Sources and References - I noticed a few statements that were not supported by citations. It could be good to find supporting references to these statements and add them to the article.

Organization - This looks like it could be the biggest opportunity for improvement for this article. Right now all of the information is contained in the Lead section. Breaking this information up into sections would be a great contribution.