User:LaurenBooth1/sandbox

article evaluation

notes on the Noah article.


 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? --the article is relevant and centralized.
 * 2)  Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?  --The information is up to date
 * 3) What else could be improved? --There was some grammar issues.
 * 4) Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -- The article is very neutral and approaches all angles of the topic.
 * 5) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -- the article has a good balance.
 * 6) Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? --Yes, the source supports the article
 * 7) Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? --The facts are referenced with reliable reference. Some sources are biased but it is stated