User:Laurensirianni/Business/Swanson04 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Laurensirianni


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Laurensirianni/Business?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Business

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic and is well organized making the information easily understood and there is a good flow while reading. There wasn't anything that distracted me from the topic as all of the content in the article is relevant.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article neutrally talks about the Human Resources division of businesses and doesn't seem particularly biased towards the support or opposition of using Human Resources. It neutrally discusses the history, main goals, and branches of Human Resources very well.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The viewpoints are mostly fairly represented however an addition about other subdivisions of Human Resources rather than just the two most popular ones could make the representation more balanced.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

All of the citation links work properly and the sources support the claims made in the article. However, there is a whole section about the history of human resources which isn't cited and I can't find info about it on the sources used so a source should be cited for that info. Also the info used from the first source could be slightly reworded just to make sure no plagiarism issue is created (Im not a hundred percent sure if it's too close to the original source or not).

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

I'd the say the sources used for the facts are mostly reliable as they are neutral sources just talking about what Human Resources does and how they operate. However, if a more scholarly source could be found it might add to the reliability of the chosen sources but I think the ones that are used are adequate.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

All of the sources are from the last two years so the information is in date and besides anything I mentioned earlier I think the article is in a good spot so there isn't much that needs to be added.