User:Lauteur02/Palimpsest/Amir Rafeh Peer Review

General info
User: Lauteur02
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lauteur02/Palimpsest
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Palimpsest

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Today, I'll be reviewing Lauteur02's article draft that talks about Palimpsest where I will include feedback and analyze the students draft. Palimpsest is the reuse of previous writings by scrapping off the text either in writings or in images


 * 1) Are the sources current?
 * 2) The source provided by the student is not current as it was published in 1970. Although this is the case, the student does incorporate new information that's relevant to the topic
 * 3) Is the content added neutral?
 * 4) Yes, the content is neutral. The information does not seem biased, one sided, or trying to persuade the readers in thinking one idea over the other.
 * 5) Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * 6) Yes, the beginning sentence works as an introduction where it continues onto the next sentence with specific detail. In the case of the article, the six plays of Euripides are given more context after the topic is brought into perspective.
 * 7) Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * 8) Yes, the student does a good job starting with a simple lead, and give more context in the next sentence. Words and language seem neutral, clear and easy to read