User:Lavendeer Lace/Sarcophagus of the Spouses/OdellS23 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lavendeer Lace


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lavendeer Lace/sandbox/Sarcophagus of the Spouses
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sarcophagus of the Spouses

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The introduction is much more concise than the previous version and also the information is dispersed and organized much more specially. However there needs to be a summary of what the article will cover in regards to the sections within.

Content: All of the new content added is relevant to the topic and the historical context in particular is very thorough. There needs to be more information surrounding the subject and I can see the author already has a section to "Iconography and Symbolism" that should be added to as well. I also like the inclusion of similar sarcophagi because having additional references to other works of art can assist the audience with context and analysis.

Tone and Balance: The tone is factual and educational. There are no indicators of bias within the article's new content.

Sources and References: Some of the original sources have been kept but there also have been more credible ones added such as academic journals and articles to the reference section. All of the links work, and are considered up to date.

Organization: The organization has massively improved and the sections are concise and informative as well.

Images and Media: The images are relevant to the topic and also spread throughout the article in a visually appealing way. However, I wish there were more images from different angles of the piece such as the other sides and back, and I also feel the captions for the pictures could be a bit more specific bc it could help describe the image better to people who are visually impaired and have to rely on verbal description.

Overall: the author has added a useful and enlightening chunk of content while maintaining an education and non-biased tone. Obviously, I can see that there are more sections that haven't been filled out yet but indicate to me that the author is maintaining a strong sense of organization.