User:LawGenius1234/Wilderness Act/Narzse Peer Review

General info
(LawGenius1234)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:LawGenius1234/Wilderness Act
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Wilderness Act

lead
the lead of the article is well thought out with putting in background information about the topic. It details why it was created and what the act is going to asses.

content
the content seems relevant to the topic and the summary fully explains the Wilderness act. The content seems up to date compared to the act being made in 1969. there looks like there is no missing content.

tone and balance
the content is neutral, no positive or negative tones about the topic. there are no biased questions or statements. viewpoints are fairly represented. content did not attempt to persuade.

sources and references
sources include reliable primary and secondary sources. content accurately explains cited sources. sources seem current to the topic. sources are diverse.

organization
the article seems well written and no grammatical errors.