User:Lawrencekp/Zooarchaeology/Nathananguyen Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Katherine Lawrence (Lawrencekp)
 * User:Lawrencekp/Zooarchaeology

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Changes made to the Lead are concise and necessary, adding the secondary title of faunal remains was a good choice to keep a wide umbrella of topics.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes!
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, there are clear segmentations within the Lead of the work that provide an introduction that is not overly complicated.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise and well thought out.

Content

 * In your sandbox you posed the question about how you should go about integrating the faunal remains section into the rest of the article. I believe it is good to keep at least the reference to it in the Lead, as its good to start to preface your paragraph within the Lead. I don't think you should say too much about it but I think it is good to keep it at least name dropped within the beginning. The paragraph you have written for the Faunal Remains section is a little choppy, it feels like you are saying: "They did this. And also this. And also this too." I think all of the information you have included is necessary and good information, but I think finding a way to string it together better would be beneficial. That being said, I think you have a lot of good information and a lot of important points you have proposed and hit. I think you are off to an excellent start!