User:Laydindzhyan/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Banaue Rice Terraces
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. After conducting my WikiProject about Ifugao Archeology, I was interested to learn more about Banaue Rice Terraces.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, not all.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, some information that is in the lead is missing from the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I believe it is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I believe all the content on the Wikipedia page is relative to the page and no information is missing.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, it is only missing a few commas but no major grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, there are very good images.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? They are talking about information that needs to be added to the page and modified.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C-Class, Yes, WikiProject Tambayan Philippines
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It is relevant to the Ifugao Rice terraces we discussed in class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Overall the article was very informative and I learned a lot of interesting facts of Banaue Rice Terraces.
 * What are the article's strengths? It not only talked about how old the Banaue Rice Terraces are, but also how locals still use the Banaue Rice Terrances to plant rice and other vegetables.
 * How can the article be improved? More information can be added on how the Banaue Rice Terrace are used today.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? well-developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: