User:LazerRocDoc/Lithium/Eeclem Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

@LazerRocDoc


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * The draft is linked here.
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The current version of the article is linked here.
 * The current version of the article is linked here.

Content
The content is relevant to the topic and the two types of extraction methods that are included are clearly defined. Although this addition doesn't address any equity gaps, I don't think it is really in the position to do so.

Tone and Balance
The content is neutral and presents no bias or persuasion techniques, simply supplying a general outline of lithium extraction methods without favouring a specific position.

Sources and References
Although there is a reference section in this draft, there are many points within the draft that have been left with no citations.

Organization
The article is well organized and has no obvious grammatical or spelling errors. The use of multiple headings makes it easier for the reader to consume the information.

Images and Media
There are no images or media artifacts within this draft. Although I don't believe they are really necessary in this context, it could be nice for the reader to have a reference figure to be able to understand these extraction methods easier.

Overall, this draft is well executed. However, in order for it to truly be an effective addition to the preexisting Wikipedia article, it requires further citations.