User:Lbenegas4/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Type 1 Diabetes: Type 1 diabetes
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I am interested in Diabetes Mellitus Type 1

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? very concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? yes some are older than 5 years old
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? not that many
 * Are images well-captioned? yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? new research on possible causes, old references, vaccines,
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? yes its part of medicine WikiProjects, B-class and high importance
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? its a more basic and concise explanation of diabetes and major topics having todo with it. In class, we focus more on the endocrinology of the disease and how the glands and hormones are involved.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? high quality
 * What are the article's strengths? goes into detail about the most important components of T1 diabetes, such as sign and symptoms, diagnosis, and the pathophysiology. In addition, there is a lot of information about management, which is what most people seek information about.
 * How can the article be improved? probably by updating any information that is outdated, or new research has been done on.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? yes, its well-developed and a lot of work has been done on it by many people.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: Talk:Type 1 diabetes