User:Lcveletter/Los Cerritos Wetlands/Shadowlifts Peer Review

General info
Lcveletter
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Lcveletter/Los Cerritos Wetlands
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Los Cerritos Wetlands

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The additions done to this article seem to mostly span the environment and wildlife section, as well as the restoration project section. There were some content additions that seemed to add more useful information and even some grammatical additions that help the article flow better. The addition of the ecosystems in the area is quite useful. The added content is clear and neutral.

The sources seem to be mostly from the Los Cerritos Wetland Authority which is reliable. I would say maybe even an addition of a peer reviewed source discussing the impact of restoration on the wildlife in wetland habitats could be informative. Perhaps an image of maybe one of the endangered species mentioned could add to the article. I also had trouble opening this link used in #5 under the environment and wildlife section. Perhaps the site got changed after it was referenced.

Overall, these additions really did help the article be more clear and informative.