User:Ldc30507/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)Chen Duxiu
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article because Chen Duxiu was a really important leading figure in the May Fourth movement and he established New Youth. Ba jin mentions a lot about May Fourth movement and the magazine "New Youth", I would like to know more about the leading figure in that time period.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.

The Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections.

The Lead doesn't include information that is not present in the article.

The lead is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
The article's content is relevant to the topic.

The content is up-to-date.

All of the content belong to the topic, it doesn't seem like missing any thing.

The article does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is neutral.

There are not claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.

The viewpoints are not overrepresented, or underrepresented.

The article doesn't attempt to persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
All facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information

The sources are thorough.

The sources are really current, only one is in 2010s.

The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors.

The links work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The article is clear and easy to read

I didn't find any grammatical or spelling errors.

This article is well-organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
This article includes images, but only two.

The images are well-captioned.

All images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

The images are laid out in a visually appealing way.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
The conversations are mostly about the structure of the article, and adding and deleting some parts.

This article is WikiProject China, socialism, philosophy and politics and movement.

The discussion on Wikipedia is really free, every one can express their opinions freely with out any restrict.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
The article overall is really well done, it is also WikiProject.

The article organizes Chen Duxiu's whole life in a really clear way.

This article can add more images.

The article is well-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: