User:Leafsfan3/Organic synthesis/Cheerios1028 Peer Review

General info
Leafsfan3
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Leafsfan3/Organic synthesis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Organic synthesis

Evaluate the drafted changes
The edits made are solid. Perhaps keep an eye out for neutral language, as it felt that sometimes there was too much analysis off the field for a Wikipedia article (see the end of "Automated Organic Synthesis"). The Synthetic Techniques section needs more citations, and the whole section could be edited a bit more (cutting down on content/simplifying, word choice, etc.) to make it flow better. Characterization section is potentially unneeded: lack of citations, very little information, and overall should likely be its own Wikipedia page due to the amount of content required. However, could be kept in if the section is strongly linked to organic synthesis. Relevance of Organic Synthesis section is also iffy, mainly due to lack of neutral voice (somewhat persuasive). The notes on line edits to be made on the original article are all very good ideas, and highlight the main issues with the original article. Overall, the revisions done to the original article are good. The references are all reputable sources and the content added is useful. Just watch out for adding too much content and the use of a neutral voice.