User:LeahJones13/News Feed/Domoerlic123 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (LeahJones13)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: News Feed

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes the lead has been updating with content making it strong and informative.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes the article has a strong clear and concise introductory sentence.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the lead does include a brief description that outlines the articles major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The leads information is all present within the article and follows the proper procedures and outlines.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is clear and concise, sharing and informing the perfect amount of information for the viewer.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes all of the content that was added was relevant and informative for the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The content that is added is all up to date and follows the correct measures for the article.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All the content that was added belongs and fits the article, strengthening the informative side for its users.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The content is all neutrally presented without bias. The writing is strictly informative and adds essence to the article.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are no bias claims within the article. All the claims are cited and informative.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The views of the writing are all neutral and of informative nature.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? The content that was added does not attempt to persuade the reader and user, it is all neutrally written without a bias.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes the content is backed up and all cited properly by reliable sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources all reflect the literature and are all on topic, they are all informative and properly cited.
 * Are the sources current? The sources are current and are reliable for the information of the article.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? All the links work properly and are easy to access.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? All the content added was well written and easy to understand. The content added a great deal of information to the article.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? All the content was grammatically correct and all made sense with easy coincides and clear flow.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content was all organized and broken down, easy to understand, reflecting all the major points.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The article has one image which is properly cited, including a clear caption. Some more images may be a nice touch to balance the writing.
 * Are images well-captioned? As I stated above the image is well captioned, with a clear and concise statement.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes the image was properly generated following the rules and regulations.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? The image is a nice balance to the writing, placed in a spot that is easily seen and visible.

For New Articles Only ****(The article News Feed is an existing article)*******
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The content that was added, was a strong contribution and added to the informative side of the article. The content improved the overall quality and strengthened it as a whole.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths of the content added include the following; the informative aspect of the writing was increased greatly. The grammatical side clear and concise, with citations and sources of reliable nature. Overall as a whole the quality of the article was strengthened and improved.
 * How can the content added be improved? The content was already improved to a great degree, to add maybe one more image would be a nice touch.

Overall evaluation
Overall I really enjoyed reading the News Feed article, I learned a lot of information as well as appreciated the structure and citations of the article.